Entries in Announcement (139)


Changing the conversation from wellness to total wellbeing

By Claire Thayer, November 10, 2016

This week, Robin Bouvier from Aon’s Health Transformation Team, spoke in a HealthcareWebSummit webinar, co-sponsored by WebMD Health Services, on More than Meets the ROI: The Value of Investing in a Healthy Workforce.   Today’s forward thinking companies are moving towards a culture of health and changing the conversation about employee wellness from a ‘benefit’ to instead looking at health as a business imperative that’s integrated across all aspects of the organization.

Robin shares some perspective on general health of the workforce and somewhat surprisingly, the younger generations are not necessarily healthier:


Baby Boomers (1946-1964)

Generation X (1965 -1978)

Millennials (1979-1996)

Tobacco Use

















Robin tells us that wellness is evolving to an all encompassing, total wellbeing approach: “Wellbeing means having the appropriate resources, opportunities and commitment needed to achieve optimal function, health and performance for the individual and the organization.” Total wellbeing interconnects:

  • Emotional – attitudes and everyday living

  • Physical – energy to complete daily living tasks

  • Financial – confidently manage everyday and future finances

  • Social – connections to others

Robin cited recent study findings of the impact of total wellbeing:

  • 81% less like to seek out new employer in next year

  • 41% less work missed because of poor health

  • 69% of consumers say wellbeing programs health them get or stay healthy

  • 22% more profitable as organizations

  • 10% higher customer ratings

  • ½ point higher performance rating by supervisor

From the new Aon Hewitt 2016 Financial Mindset Study, Robin identifies employee needs by financial stage as:

  • Security: 30%

  • Foundation: 25%

  • Growth: 36%

  • Freedom: 9%


It’s Complicated – Navigating Health Care Integrated Delivery Networks

By Claire Thayer, October 7, 2016

Integrated delivery networks (IDNs) are vast and complex. In the U.S. alone, there are more the 626 IDNs operating at 44,000 sites, employing over 412,000 health care providers.  Some IDNs are groups of hospitals, some are regional, some have facilities scattered throughout the country and even internationally – think Kaiser Permanente and the Mayo Clinic – both long standing traditional IDNs. More and more health systems are taking on risk management for their patient populations and in doing so, are looking for ways to collaborate with health plans and providers and related entities to align efficiencies in overall patient care management.  In the not to distant future, expect to see most provider organizations involved at some level with an IDN. 

Navigating IDNs and understanding the scope of their reach is the focus of a recent MCOL infographoid, co-sponsored by LexisNexis Health Care, highlighted below:

MCOL’s weekly infoGraphoid is a benefit for MCOL Basic members and released each Wednesday as part of the MCOL Daily Factoid e-newsletter distribution service – find out more here.


What Health Plans Should Know About Marketing Costs

By Claire Thayer, September 29, 2016

Getting your message in front of the right audience sounds easy enough, but can be quite complicated for health plans during open enrollment season as well as throughout the year for member outreach.  A recent study of administrative expenses for Blue Cross Blue Shield finds that the 26.5% of total PMPM expenses is attributed directly to sales and marketing activities.  Being judicious and figuring out best practices for member engagement, when to contact members, identifying the healthcare CEO of the household, what language members speak at home, etc. requires marketing tools with intelligence capabilities to optimize campaign initiatives.

Helping health plans to keep their marketing costs down is the focus of a recent MCOL infographoid, co-sponsored by LexisNexis Health Care, highlighted below:

MCOL’s weekly infoGraphoid is a benefit for MCOL Basic members and released each Wednesday as part of the MCOL Daily Factoid e-newsletter distribution service – find out more here.


Workplace family monthly health premiums rise to $1,512; deductibles up 12% in 2016

By Claire Thayer, September 15, 2016

In 2016, employer-sponsored health insurance covered half of the non-elderly population.  For the 18th year in a row,  the Kaiser Family Foundation & Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET) published findings from its annual survey of employers reflecting trends of employer sponsored health benefits on premiums, employee cost-sharing, wellness programs and employer opinions in the 2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey.  Here are a few highlights:

  • The average premium for single coverage in 2016 is $536 per month, or $6,435 per year.
  • The average premium for family coverage is $1,512 per month or $18,142 per year
  • The $18,142 average family premium in 2016 is 20% higher than the average family premium in 2011 and 58% higher than the average family premium in 2006
  • Among those with a general annual deductible for family coverage, the percentages of covered workers with an average aggregate general annual deductible are 61% for workers in HMOs, 64% for workers in PPOs, and 77% for workers in POS plans
  • The share of covered workers in plans with a general annual deductible has increased significantly over time: from 55% in 2006, to 74% in 2011, to 83% in 2016, as have the average deductible amounts for covered workers in plans with deductibles: from $584 in 2006, to $991 in 2011, to $1,478 in 2016
  • Eighty-three percent of firms offering health benefits in 2016 offer only one type of health plan. Large firms are more likely to offer more than one plan type than small firms (53% vs. 16%)
  • Enrollment remains highest in PPO plans, covering just under half of covered workers, followed by HDHP/SOs, HMO plans, POS plans, and conventional plans.
  • Forty-eight percent of covered workers are enrolled in PPOs, followed by HDHP/SOs (29%), HMOs (15%), POS plans (9%), and conventional plans (< 1%)
  • Nearly all (more than 99%) covered workers work at a firm that provides prescription drug coverage in their largest health plan.
  • Sixty-one percent of covered workers are in a self-funded health plan.
  • Twenty-four percent of large firms (200 or more workers) that offer health benefits to their employees offer retiree coverage in 2016, similar to recent years.
  • Among large firms that have a health risk assessment, 54% offer an incentive to employees to complete the assessment

Says KFF President and CEO Drew Altman, “We’re seeing premiums rising at historically slow rates, which helps workers and employers alike, but it’s made possible in part by the more rapid rise in the deductibles workers must pay.”


More info:

  • Summary of findings is here
  • Entire report with over 200 exhibits in 14 different sections is here
  • News release is here
  • Health Affairs article is here



High Drug Prices, Complexity of Drug Development and What the Market Will Bear

By Claire Thayer, August 30, 2016

The escalating cost of prescription drugs is of concern for all of us and impact stakeholders all across the health continuum: patients, payers, providers, as well as policy makers.   A recent Consumer Reports study, Is There a Cure for High Drug Prices?, offers these 5 reasons drug costs are ballooning:

  • Reason #1: Drug Companies Can Charge Whatever Price They Want
  • Reason #2: Insurance Companies Are Also Charging You More
  • Reason #3: Old Drugs Are Reformulated as Costly ‘New’ Drugs
  • Reason #4: Generic Drug Shortages Can Trigger Massive Price Increases
  • Reason #5: Specialty Drugs Are Costing All of Us

This week, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) released an in-depth article, The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States, which explores literature from January 2005 to July 2016 for sources of drug prices in the U.S., justification and consequences of high prices and possible solutions.  The authors conclude that “high drug prices are the result of the increasing cost and complexity of drug development but also arise in large part from the approach the United States has taken to the granting of government-protected monopolies to drug manufacturers, combined with restriction of price negotiation at a level not observed in other industrialized nations.”

Among overall study findings:

  • In 2013, per capita spending on prescription drugs was $858 compared with an average of $400 for 19 other industrialized nations.
  • In the United States, prescription medications now comprise an estimated 17% of overall personal health care services.
  • The most important factor that allows manufacturers to set high drug prices is market exclusivity, protected by monopoly rights awarded upon Food and Drug Administration approval and by patents.
  • The availability of generic drugs after this exclusivity period is the main means of reducing prices in the United States, but access to them may be delayed by numerous business and legal strategies.
  • The primary counterweight against excessive pricing during market exclusivity is the negotiating power of the payer, which is currently constrained by several factors, including the requirement that most government drug payment plans cover nearly all products.
  • Another key contributor to drug spending is physician prescribing choices when comparable alternatives are available at different costs.
  • Although prices are often justified by the high cost of drug development, there is no evidence of an association between research and development costs and prices; rather, prescription drugs are priced in the United States primarily on the basis of what the market will bear.